By Lana Mitchell
When I was in the Sea Org at the Int base, we had “Source Night” on Saturday nights, and it consisted of listening to an LRH lecture and reading along with the transcript.
Over the 13 years I was there must have been at least 4 or 5 times that the LRH lecture THE WRONG THING TO DO IS NOTHING was played – and every time (particularly as we got into the 2000’s) there was an indirect or a very direct implication that we, as staff, were not taking responsibility for the scene at the base. There was such pressure brought on us regarding this lecture that I had developed quite a ridge on the lecture – and on its contents.
Recently I restudied the lecture. I was amazed at the different message that I got out of the lecture and how very different the concepts are when a) I am not longer in the hostile environment I was in, b) when I have my own case progressing well and am moving up The Bridge, and c) when I have a new look (a bright one) on the future of Scientology and my own involvement and responsibility for it.
Some of you reading this may or may not have the same ridge that I had on this lecture – but I thought you would enjoy reading this section in a new unit of time. I don’t feel pawnish (or privatish) any more – but I certainly had done for quite a long time.
My view at this time is that there is much to this game Scientology – and I am all for playing it rather than bailing out.
Here is the excerpt:
THE WRONG THING TO DO IS NOTHING, 17 Nov 1954:
"Now, essentially, the physical universe is a game. Game is a third dynamic operation, so is auditing, so is communication - third dynamic.
"This universe would have no value whatsoever unless it could be used as a playing field. That would have no value.
"Now, in the Philadelphia Lectures, 1953, and in the Doctorate Lectures, late 52, this was pretty thoroughly covered -- this matter of games. And the truth of the matter is, is there -- as far as the reason why is concerned, of existence, there is no reason why.
"So a person only becomes baffled about a reason why when it has ceased to be a game. Well, how could it cease to be a game? By a person no longer being a player. A person is no longer a player. A person becomes a pawn. What do you think a pawn on a chessboard thinks about?
"It waits there for somebody else to move it. It might sit there and look at the rest of the board maybe, but it's merely a spectator. Somebody else has got to come along and move it on another square.
"Of course, there's one step lower than this, that's a broken pawn. But the preclear who comes in and sits in the chair and waits for the auditor to move him into various positions on the board and just moves simply because the auditor said so, kind of wonders what's going to happen and expects something to happen, maybe and maybe not. But he's just there, you know? He's in this situation of a pawn.
"The auditor's mission is to bring him up a where he can be to some degree a player. If he can't play a game, he can't do anything because there's nothing else to do. That's the hideous part of all this. People come around they tell you, "Now, life is serious. It's important".
"You know what they're trying to do? Trying to make a pawn out of you. That's how you make pawns. You come up to some somebody and you say, "Now, listen. Life is serious. It's important, so forth and so on. And you are an 'it', you know, and it's very serious and it's very important, and you move when I move you."
"Next thing you know, why you feel kind of pawnish or if you’re in the army, privatish." LRH
You have no rights to post comments
Comments
ML Tom
and great quote.
Love,
SKM
Lana, a big thank you for reacquainting us with the power and sheer joy of the tech that so many people have forgotten.
RSS feed for comments to this post